Category: Company News

  • The Powell-Trump meeting 'mostly just politics' but is helping soothe the market

    President Donald Trump and Fed Chairman Jerome Powell finally met face-to-face Tuesday, giving the two leaders a chance to communicate and helping to remove one small layer of uncertainty surrounding the markets and the economy.

    Monday night’s dinner, which Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and Fed Vice Chairman Richard Clarida also attended, came after a year of rancor during which the president has harshly criticized the central bank chief.

    On an official basis, neither side revealed much.

    Word from the White House was that the dinner featured a “very good exchange of ideas” and “no pitchforks.” The Fed said it was to “discuss recent economic developments and the outlook for growth, employment and inflation.”

    From a market perspective, though, a more cordial relationship between the two sides is better than the alternative of worries about whether the Fed’s political independence could be compromised by a meddling president who might actually replace the chairman if he continued to raise rates.

    “I look at as more an opportunity for Powell to express his thoughts on things, because there’s no mystery of Trump’s thoughts on things with respect to monetary policy. Trump never wanted Powell to raise interest rates at all,” said Peter Boockvar, chief investment advisor at Bleakley Advisory Group. “I’m hoping that Powell used this as an opportunity to explain what he’s doing.”

    The tenor of the meeting may been helped in that the Fed over the past several weeks has come closer to Trump’s thinking.

    At last week’s policy meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee, Powell and his fellow central bankers set forth a “patient” approach to future rate hikes. Powell himself told media members that he would need convincing proof that more tightening is necessary before trying to push further increases.

    That was a considerable shift from just a month earlier, when officials indicated two rate hikes were likely in 2019 and Powell said another aspect of policy normalization, the reduction of the bond holdings on the Fed’s balance sheet, was on “autopilot.”

    Trump has long worried that a tighter Fed would thwart the economic recovery and bull market.

    A meeting of the minds between Powell and the president matters “at a very high level, because it affects perception,” said Christopher Whalen, head of Whalen Global Advisors. “There are investors who think that’s important, but I think the fundamentals underneath, particularly the credit markets, are what’s really driving things.”

    Getting the president more acquainted with the nuance that can influence Fed decisions could help Powell’s position. The Fed’s own senior loan officer survey of banking executives released Monday showed slowing demand and tighter conditions for commercial and industrial loans.

    Markets don’t expect any more rate increases this year, which was the case before the Powell-Trump meeting.

    “I think it’s mostly just politics,” Whalen said. “I don’t think Powell or anybody else on the board of governors is going to react to a president or any other politician’s comments on monetary policy.”

    Though this was the first for Powell and Trump, meetings between presidents and Fed chairs are nothing new.

    Former President Barack Obama and then-Fed Chair Janet Yellen met on multiple occasions, with one in April 2016 gathering some attention because of a perception that Obama was worried about rate increases that slow down the economy and tarnish his legacy. After that meeting, both sides said the economy was discussed but there was nothing on rate policy.

    Trump’s criticism of Powell stood out because of its very public nature. The president used his favorite megaphone, Twitter, to chastise the central bank, and White House leaks indicated that Trump was contemplating replacing Powell if the Fed kept moving rates higher.

    Stocks were higher Monday in the wake of the meeting, with David Rosenberg, chief economist and strategist, noting that “anything to give Mr. Market a sense that the Fed will remain on this freshly paved dovish course” helps spark confidence.

  • Apple is among the biggest buyback offenders that could be flagged by the Schumer-Sanders limit

    Companies including Apple and Microsoft are among the biggest spenders on share buybacks, a practice that Senate liberals are apparently opposed to.

    Over the past 10 years, tech giant Apple has been the biggest buyback champion, splurging a whopping $239 million on share repurchases, followed by Exxon Mobil and Microsoft, according to data from Birinyi Associates. The iPhone-maker also dominated six of the 10 largest buybacks in history, the data show. Birinyi has kept an extensive database of stock buybacks going back to 1985.

    These companies have come under the spotlight after prominent lawmakers criticized the buyback practice for widening the wealth gap, claiming repurchase programs tend to divert resources away from workers.

    Senate Democratic leader Charles Schumer of New York and Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont are calling for legislation that would prevent companies from buying back their own shares unless they first pay workers at least $15 an hour and offer paid time off and health benefits.

    The Democratic proposal came after announced buybacks hit a record of $1.04 trillion in 2018 as the corporate tax cut boosted profits and free cash flow. In the third quarter of 2018, 18 percent of the Corporate America reduced their outstanding share counts by at least 4 percent, which boosted their earnings per share, according to S&P Dow Jones Indices.

    New buyback announcements have also edged up in the last quarter of 2018 to the highest level seen since the first quarter of 2016, according to RBC Capital Markets.

    “Our optimism on buybacks offsets our concerns about slowing capex growth. We also think that debt burdens are manageable and expect deleveraging to be a 2019 priority,” said Lori Calvasinal, RBC’s head of U.S. equity strategy.

    There hasn’t been a lack of supporters for buybacks on Wall Street. Goldman Sachs’ former chief executive Lloyd Blankfein hit back at proposal limiting buybacks in a tweet, saying “the money doesn’t vanish.”

    tweet

    Blankfein and others claim buybacks are another way to give money back to shareholders so it can be put to use in higher growth areas. But Schumer and Sanders say that because the rich are the biggest owners of stock, it mostly goes into their pockets.

  • US service firms grew at slower pace in January

    U.S. service companies grew in January at the slowest pace in six months, amid concern over the impact of the partial government shutdown on the economy.

    The Institute for Supply Management, an association of purchasing managers, reports that its service index fell to 56.7 percent last month, down from 58 percent in December. The January reading was the lowest since July 2018.

    Any reading above 50 signals growth. So even with the January decline, the index shows that service industries, where most Americans work, has been expanding for 108 consecutive months. The ISM notes that executives of service companies remain optimistic about overall business conditions.

  • US services sector activity at 6-month low; shutdown blamed

    U.S. services sector activity slowed to a six-month low in January as businesses worried about the impact of a partial shutdown of the federal government on the economy.

    Despite showing a second straight monthly moderation in activity, the Institute for Supply Management (ISM) report on Tuesday continued to suggest solid economic growth. The five-week government shutdown ended on Jan. 25 after President Donald Trump and Congress agreed to temporarily fund the government, without money for his U.S.-Mexico border wall.

    “This was clearly a disappointing non-manufacturing reading, aggravated by a number of factors, one of which was temporary,” said Jennifer Lee, a senior economist at BMO Capital Markets in Toronto. “We anticipate a retracement of this setback in February, but that temporary factor may return to the fore.”

    The ISM said its non-manufacturing activity index dropped 1.3 points to a reading of 56.7 last month. That was the lowest reading since July and marked two straight monthly declines.

    A reading above 50 indicates expansion in the sector, which accounts for more than two-thirds of U.S. economic activity. The ISM’s new orders sub-index for the services sector tumbled 5.0 points to a reading of 57.7 last month, the lowest since December 2017. Its business activity or production gauge also fell sharply. There was also a steep decline in the survey’s measure of export orders.

    The survey’s services employment measure rose to 57.8 from a reading of 56.6 in December.

    U.S. financial markets were little moved by the data as traders awaited Trump’s State of the Union address. The dollar was up against a basket of currencies, while U.S. Treasury yields fell. Stocks on Wall Street were trading higher.

    According to the ISM, respondents were “concerned about the impacts of the government shutdown but remain mostly optimistic about overall business conditions.” Some businesses complained about higher prices because of import tariffs and others said they were struggling with capacity constraints.

    Eleven services industries, including transportation and warehousing, healthcare and social assistance, finance and insurance, utilities, and public administration, reported growth in January. That was down from 16 in December and the fewest since August 2016.

    Seven non-manufacturing industries including retail trade, educational services and information reported contraction in January. The ebb in sentiment was also mirrored by another survey from data firm Markit, which showed its services sector PMI falling to a four-month low of 54.2 in January from a reading of 54.4 in December.

    “We think that concerns about the government shutdown may have been depressing sentiment,” said Daniel Silver, an economist at JPMorgan in New York. ” Now that the shutdown is over, we think that sentiment could bounce back at least somewhat, but this is not guaranteed.”

  • Wild crude oil price swings may be new normal for markets as US, Russia and Saudis vie for influence

    During just six months, crude oil prices ripped higher by about 20 percent, plunged more than 40 percent and snapped back 25 percent, an intense volatility that analysts warn could be the new normal in the oil market.

    December was a real nightmare for the global market where the swings were $50 at a low, $86 at a high and $68 for the average of Brent crude oil. Brent was trading at about $62.44 per barrel in the futures market Tuesday, while Western Texas Intermediate was $54.25 per barrel.

    Booming U.S. oil production and the rise of the United States to become the world’s largest producer has certainly factored in the shift away from OPEC as the main entity controlling supply and prices. In 2016, Saudi Arabia led other OPEC members to align with Russia and other producers to use their combined clout to manage global energy prices.

    Another factor new to the market is the active participation of President Donald Trump, who through tweets and comments has pressured both Saudi Arabia and OPEC to let up on production when prices are high. Trump has also moved to sanction two members of OPEC, Iran and Venezuela, impacting global oil supply.

    “In this boom-bust era, as in prior ones, you can have a year or two of stability, but in general when you don’t have an effective swing producer and you have big imbalances and geopolitical risk,” there’s volatility, said Robert McNally, President of Rapidan Energy Group. “I’m telling everybody, ‘Buckle up.’ That’s the market we’re in for the foreseeable future.”

    The Saudi-Russia alliance raised production last summer to help add oil to the market ahead of the Iran sanctions and amid concerns of a tight market. Russia and Saudi Arabia touted their joint effort and their broader relationship was front and center last year when a smiling Russian President Vladimir Putin met Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman on the sidelines of the World Cup.

    The new dominance of the U.S. in the oil market, combined with the Saudi-Russia alliance, means new tensions, and the industry will have to adjust.

    “It certainly means we’re going to be in a more volatile world when it comes to oil prices. I think it means more caution about long cycle oil projects. I think that’s an immediate impact,” said Daniel Yergin, vice chairman of IHS Markit. “I think the oil price is moved by what happens with the overall financial markets. It means sentiment will have a bigger impact on the oil price. A big surge in U.S. oil production becomes bearish for the global market so you get more and more complicated feedback loops.”

    The 20 percent surge in prices during last summer came as the market anticipated the sanctions by the U.S. would take most of Iran’s oil off the market. At the time, the Trump administration had warned there would be no waivers, and that all of Iran’s oil would be forced off the market. But by fall, when sanctions were close to going into effect, the Trump administration granted some exemptions to countries that buy Iranian crude and oil prices tanked.

    The drop accelerated as investors became fearful about a global economic slowdown. But since Dec. 24, prices for West Texas Intermediate crude have come back by about 28 percent. Prices have been rising most recently on the idea that the U.S. will keep Venezuelan oil off the market.

    As the U.S. moves to sanction Venezuela because of unrest and the humanitarian crisis under the leadership of the Maduro government, some analysts say the Saudi Arabian-Russian alliance may not be so quick to make a move to end the production cuts they put in place in December after oil prices began to plunge.

    “There’s nothing to indicate today that the Saudis have any intent of rushing to fill the gap,” left by Venezuela, said Helima Croft, chief global commodities strategist at RBC. “They were early with their surge, and they oversupplied the market in the run up to the [Iran] sanctions decision.”

    Analysts believe Venezuela is producing less than 1 million barrels a day, and its exports appear frozen, as the government demands cash for cargoes. Croft said she was expecting 300,000 to 500,000 barrels to be removed from the market without the sanctions, but now there could be several hundred thousand more.

    “I think the market over-fixated on the [Iran] exemptions, but the Saudis opened the spigots in a big way. They opened the floodgates,” said Croft. Saudi Arabia ramped up production to just over 11 million barrels a day in November, just as the Trump administration was about to announce it was exempting India, Japan, and South Korea, among others, from full compliance with the Iranian sanctions.

    McNally said the market believed that the exemptions would not be granted, as they had been during the Obama administration when the United Nations sanctioned Iran’s oil sector. That started oil’s freefall which continued into late December.

    “The only thing President Trump hates more than Iran is high oil prices. He went easy and the price collapsed,” McNally said.

    Croft said she had been concerned that Trump’s comments on high oil prices, made around the midterm elections, could backfire.

    “The way he talked down the price of oil, he was really imperiling the financials of the countries that had been very helpful to him during the summer,” Croft said. “Was that social media fist pumping going to come back to haunt him? Can he cajole them to do this? I don’t know if he can get them to act against their own economic self-interest. I think the Saudis are pursuing a ‘Saudi first’ policy. You cannot say that the Saudis and Emiratis were not helpful to the Trump administration. He seemingly has a price target that’s substantially lower than theirs.”

    John Kilduff of Again Capital said the Saudi-Russian alliance reacted too quickly to replace Iranian crude and it could again. “It’s making matters worse. It’s like an amateur trader. They’re getting sucked in at the market bottom and at the top.”

    Saudi Arabia and Russia may also not be as close in their view on supply as their partnership would suggest. Russian oil companies have opposed the cuts, and Saudi Arabia is shouldering the bulk of them. Eric Lee, energy analyst at Citigroup, said Saudi Arabia envisions itself as a central banker of oil that helps stabilize the oil price.

    “But there are a couple of flaws in that. One is that they’re not a dispassionate central banker that’s independent. They have their own interests. Their interests are that for their government spending, they need oil revenues. They would love oil prices in the $70s and $80s. That’s what it would take to balance their budgets,” he said.

    “The Russians are separating from them as well. They need the Russians more than the Russians need them in many ways, there’s a balance but at least economically, the Saudis need $70 to $80. Russia budgets for $40 and the government is more insulated by the ruble,” Lee said.

    Analysts said the partnership could ultimately back off the production cuts, and there’s a meeting coming up in April where production will be discussed.

    “You have a couple too many cooks in the kitchen. Even as other people are running around doing their own thing, there’s a couple of dynamics,” Lee said. “How many more rounds do the Saudis try to cut or hold cuts to support prices in the near term. At what point might they see market share is being lost and at what point do they flip again?” Lee said.

    Source: Citigroup

    Lee said he expects the arrangement between Russia and Saudi Arabia to hold together.

    “There’s a benefit of Putin being extremely engaged as being an oil market kingpin, geopolitically and in the Middle East,” he said. “I’m not talking about a schism. It’s just when it comes to talking about whether to cut, the Russian position is much more reluctant to cut or hold cuts longer. Their industry certainly doesn’t want it, and the Russian government itself doesn’t need it anywhere as much as the Saudis do.”

    But the U.S. production is also factor impacting prices. At 11.9 million barrels a day, the U.S. is producing 2 million more barrels a day than it was last year, according to weekly data from the Energy Information Administration.

    “Out to 2023, prices might only need to be $45 to $60 because when you go above that or below that you have too much shale, or too little shale. It means whenever Saudis want to push prices out of that range, there’s going to be an opposite reaction to that that gives them trouble,” Lee said.

    Kilduff said oil rose about 10 percent on the Venezuela sanctions, but it has also been swinging up and down on the rig count in the U.S.

    “I think they’re having a difficult time, the Saudis in particular, and OPEC with this new paradigm. They tend to overshoot both ways and they kind of got suckered into putting more oil on the market because of the Iranian sanctions fears and they’re trying to rein it back in after the price collapse,” Kilduff said.

  • Retail sales expected to climb as much as 4.4 percent in 2019, retail industry trade group says

    U.S. retail sales in 2019 could climb between 3.8 and 4.4 percent, “despite threats from an ongoing trade war, the volatile stock market and the effects of the government shutdown,” according to a report released Tuesday by the National Retail Federation.

    This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.

  • Retail sales growth might not be as robust this year, with trade, government shutdown concerns

    U.S. retail sales in 2019 could climb between 3.8 and 4.4 percent, “despite threats from an ongoing trade war, the volatile stock market and the effects of the government shutdown,” according to a report released Tuesday by the National Retail Federation.

    That would be less than growth of 4.6 percent in 2018, which NRF says is its preliminary estimate for retail sales last year, pending the release of December data from the Commerce Department that was stalled from being announced during the government shutdown. NRF in August of last year said it expected 2018 retail sales to be up at least 4.5 percent.

    This year, NRF says retail sales should amount to more than $3.8 trillion — excluding automobile dealers, gasoline stations and restaurants.

    It said online and other non-store sales were up 10.4 percent, amounting to $682.8 billion, last year, and NRF is calling for the same 10 to 12 percent growth online in 2019.

    There are a number of uncertainties at play in the retail industry today that could impede some of this growth, though.

    A pending trade war with China has many companies on their toes, not knowing if another wave of tariffs could go into effect later this year on goods like cotton-based apparel. There’s fear that the U.S. economy is starting to cool off, which could lead to shoppers pulling back on spending.

    “Most important for the year ahead will be the ongoing strength in the job market, which will support the consumer income and spending that are both key drivers of the economy,” NRF Chief Economist Jack Kleinhenz said. “The bottom line is that the economy is in a good place despite the ups and downs of the stock market and other uncertainties.”

  • Ginsburg makes first public appearance since cancer surgery

    Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg made her first public appearance since undergoing lung cancer surgery, attending a concert in her honor given by her daughter-in-law and other musicians.

    Ginsburg, 85, had surgery in New York on Dec. 21. She missed arguments at the court in January, her first illness-related absence in more than 25 years as a justice, and has been recuperating at her home in Washington.

    On Monday night, Ginsburg attended a concert at a museum a few blocks from the White House. It was given by Patrice Michaels, who is married to Ginsburg’s son, James. Michaels is a soprano and composer.

    The concert was dedicated to Ginsburg’s life in the law.

    The justice sat in the back of the darkened auditorium at the National Museum of Women in the Arts. The National Constitution Center, which sponsored the concert, did not permit photography.

    The performance concluded with a song set to Ginsburg’s answers to questions.

    In introducing the last song, Michaels said, “bring our show to a close, but not the epic and notorious story of RBG.”

    Ginsburg had two previous bouts with cancer. She had colorectal cancer in 1999 and pancreatic cancer in 2009.

    James Ginsburg said before the concert that his mother is walking a mile a day and meeting with her personal trainer twice a week.

  • Papa John's CEO: We're hopeful we can bring founder John Schnatter along after Starboard deal

    Papa John’s CEO Steve Ritchie said that the company hopes that founder John Schnatter stops feuding with the pizza chain after it announced a deal with hedge fund Starboard Value.

    “Obviously, we’re very hopeful that we can bring John along ,” Ritchie told CNBC’s David Faber on “Squawk on the Street” Tuesday.

    The embattled pizza chain announced a $200 million investment from the activist hedge fund Monday. The deal comes after a turbulent year for Papa John’s. Schnatter has been feuding with the company ever since he was ousted as chairman following a series of public scandals, including the use of the N-word on a conference call. The public relations crisis resulted in negative same-store sales growth for every quarter of 2018.

    “The decision we arrived at is in the best interest of its shareholders and stakeholders,” Ritchie said.

    The deal dilutes Schnatter’s stake in the company from 31 percent to 26 percent, a person familiar with the matter told CNBC. Schnatter presented a competing plan to Papa John’s special committee when he heard about Starboard’s proposal, but the company rejected it, according to a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

    In addition to the investment, Starboard’s Chief Executive Jeff Smith, who is credited with turning around Olive Garden’s parent company Darden Restaurants, is now chairman of the company’s board.

    Smith said that the current situation with Papa John’s is similar to Olive Garden before its turnaround and that Starboard plans to use a similar strategy that focuses on the pizza chain’s competitive advantages, like its six simple ingredients.

    “The appointment of Jeffrey Smith as Chairman is particularly welcome as his experience in foodservice will ensure that Papa John’s makes the right strategic moves over the next year. In a sense, the company is professionalizing itself after a period of poor management,” Neil Saunders, managing director of GlobalData Retail, said.

    The pizza company had been pursuing an outright sale before settling on the deal with Starboard. The deal does not rule out a future sale, according to a person familiar with the situation.

    —CNBC’s Lauren Hirsch contributed to this report.

  • Democrat John Hickenlooper to host a birthday fundraiser in New York as he contemplates 2020 run

    John Hickenlooper, the Democratic former Colorado governor, is coming to New York on Thursday to celebrate his birthday and raise money for his political action committee as he mulls entering the 2020 race for president, CNBC has learned.

    Hickenlooper will be hosting a birthday celebration in midtown Manhattan. Suggested contributions to his Giddy Up political action committee range from $500 to $5,000, according to an invitation first reviewed by CNBC.

    While the invitation does not say whether Hickenlooper has decided to run for president, an email to prospective donors hints at a major announcement could be on the horizon.

    “After having finished his tenure of sixteen years of public service in Colorado (eight years as Mayor of Denver and eight as Governor), Hickenlooper is exploring his next steps to figure out if there is a path for him to help re-orient the nation’s politics by solving problems together,” the email says.

    Hickenlooper will be turning 67 years old.

    A spokeswoman for his PAC confirmed that Hickenlooper will be hosting his party on Thursday but declined to give details on how many people or who will be attending the event.

    The development that Hickenlooper will be coming to New York for a birthday fundraiser comes after CNBC reported that he’s one of several other governors and former governors considering a run for president who have recently reached out to top Wall Street and state wide financiers.

    Hickenlooper told CNN last week that he has the potential to be the Democratic nominee that beats President Donald Trump in two years but stopped short of an official announcement.

    “I think to beat Trump, I think you’re going to do better with someone like myself that has a record of accomplishing bringing people together and accomplishing, you know, challenging solutions,” Hickenlooper said.

    Through the end of 2018, his PAC has raised just over $600,000 and currently has over $330,000 on hand.